Training · · 3 min read

The Tradeoff: Jumping Higher vs Jumping Faster

The Tradeoff: Jumping Higher vs Jumping Faster

Drop jumps and RSI are staples in performance testing. Coaches often chase shorter ground contact times or higher jumps, assuming improvements in either reflect better stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) function.

The problem is that RSI is a ratio, and ratios can hide meaningful changes.

How much does jump height actually change when ground contact time changes?

Force Plate Course
CTA Image

The Simplest and Fastest Way to Learn Jump Analysis with Force Plates

Unlock 50+ Lessons Now →

What Did the Researchers Do?

Participants

Task

Three instruction conditions

Measurements included ground contact time, jump height, and reactive strength index (RSI), while analysis examined how jump height scales with GCT

What Were the Results?

Athletes clearly changed strategy based on instruction

2. RSI did NOT change

Jump height and GCT had a strong linear relationship

What Does This Mean?

Athletes don’t freely improve jump height without paying a time cost. Within an athlete, performance tends to move along a personal force-time line, not off it.

Shorter GCT strategies rely on:

Longer GCT strategies allow:

RSI stayed the same because height and time rise or fall together.

Why RSI Alone Is a Problem

RSI hides how performance is achieved.

Two jumps can have:

If you only track RSI, you can miss out on strategy changes.

Coach’s Takeaway

I hope this helps,

Ramsey

Reference
Boccia G, Serrano S, Bonelli B, La Torre A, Pavei G. (2026). The scaling factor between jump height and ground contact time in drop jumps: A linear relationship at the individual level. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 40(2), 152–157.

Read next