· 2 min read

"Stress Is Stress" is Not Accurate

"Stress Is Stress" is Not Accurate
Photo by Molly Blackbird / Unsplash

In strength and conditioning circles, you’ll often hear a familiar phrase:

“Stress is stress.”

It reminds us that all forms of stress, including mental, emotional, mechanical, and metabolic, affect the body and recovery.

And while that’s directionally true, it’s also not entirely accurate.

Because not all stress is created equal.

Not All Stress is Created Equal

Not all stress has the same effects on performance, fatigue, or injury risk.

Saying “stress is stress” glosses over important distinctions in how the body perceives, processes, and recovers from different types of stress.

A few of the key differences:

Allostatic Load is Real, But Nuanced

Yes, the brain and body integrate all forms of stress over time.

However, the effect of each type on tissue tolerance, movement quality, performance and injury risk varies.

While simplifying complexity can help us in the field, oversimplification can make us overlook important details.

Performing sprint repeats is not the same as getting only 4 hours of sleep, and high-volume eccentric contractions for the hamstrings are much different from the stress of not playing.

And this is not just theoretical; what we would do to recover from these stressors would also be different.

Coach's Takeaway

Let's stop using “stress is stress” as a blanket statement.

Start identifying the source and type of stress to understand the athlete's needs better.

This allows you to make better training decisions, such as adjusting volume, swapping modalities, or integrating recovery strategies that target the type of stress your athletes are under.

Read next